You're about to make a decision about AI in your practice and the people around you all have something to sell. A vendor with a product. A consultant with an implementation. A colleague who read the same LinkedIn posts you did. Getting the technical reality straight, before you commit, is the one thing none of them can give you.
You understand this space better than the lawyers you're talking to, but you're building your technical judgment as you go. That shows up as scope creep, engagements you underpriced, and clients who feel overpromised by the end.
You're the person expected to evaluate AI vendors and make calls nobody around you can verify. Get it wrong and you're either locked into something you shouldn't be, or you've lost the trust of the people counting on you.
You want to build around AI from day one but you don't know what that actually means in practice. So you're trying tools, spending time, and still not sure if you're building something solid or a mess you'll have to redo in a few months.
"Rok brings a rare mix of deep AI expertise and practical execution. Every call leaves me with clearer scope, concrete next steps, and stronger guardrails, focused on real adoption in law firms, not hype."
"It's rare to find someone who really gets AI on a deep level, not just the software side, but LLMs and prompt design. Rok nails that balance. He doesn't need a lot of input, he's super organised, and he just gets it done."
Two ways to engage. The difference is whether you have one specific situation in front of you, or whether situations come up regularly.
A client meeting on Monday, a vendor proposal, a technical question you need answered before you move forward.
I tell you specifically how I'd approach it. You leave with something you can act on.